ASP Nuke

Article Search

Message Forums

ASP Nuke (241/458)

Suggestion Box

Have a suggestion on how we can improve this application?

Please send us your suggestions, we would love to hear what you have to say!

Help ASP Nuke

Help support "ASP Nuke" and free software by donating now

Task List

ASP Nuke Tasks:

Themes (0.67%)

Discuss topics about or relating to the ASP Nuke content management system and other related technologies.

Author	Message
Sorry, No Picture jaydeep	Do we need this Classic ASP Nuke, when ASP.NET is Saturday, March 27, 2004	e-mail . edit . reply
	Do we need this Classic ASP Nuke, when ASP.NET is now the upcoming thing of the future. Tell me any good reasion to follow Classic ASP compare to ASPX or ASP.NET

kencyber	RE: Do we need this Classic ASP Nuke, when ASP.NET is Wednesday, May 19, 2004	e-mail . edit . reply
	Classic ASP is easier to learn Classic ASP runs on older versions of IIS Classic ASP is more like traditional basic Classic ASP is more concise Classic ASP doesn't require you to dick around with configuration files Classic ASP is established and is very stable Of course this doesn't preclude a port to Dot.net in the future. Don't get your hopes up though - I haven't got that much free time on my hands.

djechelon	RE: RE: Do we need this Classic ASP Nuke, when ASP.NET is Wednesday, September 22, 2004	e-mail . edit . reply
	I think Ken is right because, even if we want to make a .NET portal, we must start from a simple code. Eiffel Tower wasn't built starting from the top... ASPNuke is now at its alpha version, but in the future (at least 3.0 version) somebody can actually suggest to start porting to ASP.NET, and it won't be difficult if we have Classic ASP codes to start from.

FAQ

Web Links

Download